Please leave this field empty
Donate Monthly Make a Gift Renew Your Membership Ways to Give
Food & Water Watch Food & Water Watch Food & Water Watch
  • About
  • Problems
  • Campaigns
  • Impacts
  • Research
  • Contact
Donate Monthly Make a Gift Renew Your Membership Ways to Give
  • facebook
  • twitter
Please leave this field empty
Food & Water Watch Food & Water Watch
$
Menu
  • About
  • News
  • Research Library
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Donate
Search
Please leave this field empty
  • facebook
  • twitter

New York Times confirms GMO industry ties at National Academies of Sciences

A groundbreaking investigation profiles Food & Water Watch’s research into conflicts of interest at the National Academies—and highlights the outsize role industry plays in GMO science and policy.

  • facebook
  • twitter
  • google-plus
  • envelope

We all need safe food and clean water.

Donate
GMO corn and money - GMOs are for corporate profits
By Tim Schwab
12.28.16

Drawing on more than two years of Food & Water Watch research, The New York Times has published a damning account of the conflicts-of-interest culture that pervades the National Academies of Sciences’ (NAS) work on GMOs. 

The Times notes the deeply one-sided panels of scientists that the Academies convenes to author its GMO reports, many of whom have undisclosed financial conflicts of interest. It also describes a troubling revolving door of staff between the NAS and the biotechnology industry. 

This story validates years of Food & Water Watch and other advocates’ efforts to expose NAS’s far-reaching conflicts of interest, which introduce bias into science and also policy making—because the federal government uses taxpayer-funded NAS research to develop “science-based” rules and regulations.

The Times story should spark a Congressional investigation into the NAS and prompt the federal government to avoid utilizing any scientific advice produce by NAS about GMOs. Just as important, it should shape how we view the larger scientific discourse on GMOs, which has long be very heavily influenced by the biotechnology industry—at public universities, academic journals, or prominent non-profit groups.  

In the summer of 2014, Food & Water Watch began documenting the outsized role that the biotechnology industry was playing in the NAS’s work on GMOs. We noted the deeply one-sided panel of scientists that NAS had recruited to author a new GMO report, many of whom had industry ties. “If industry is going to have a seat—or a surrogate—at the table,” we asked, “why don’t farmers and consumers have a champion sitting across from them?” 

We provided substantial documentation to NAS and asked that changes be made, but got no response. As the NAS project progressed, the group held a one-sided workshop on GMOs organized and overseen by pro-GMO organizations, including Monsanto and DuPont (who, it was later revealed, also funded the workshop). 

In early 2016, the NAS initiated a second GMO project, again lead by a panel of scientists overwhelmed with industry perspectives. Once again, Food & Water Watch provided the NAS with documentation about undisclosed conflicts of interest and asked that NAS make changes. Shortly after, 39 academics and public-interest groups signed on to a letter sent to NAS that echoed Food & Water Watch’s complaint, offering a withering critique about the “troubling trend of one-sidedness at the NRC that jeopardizes public trust.” This time NAS responded, but only to say it didn’t think it had a problem.

In May of 2016, NAS released a major new GMO report whose top-level finding, widely broadcast by the media, was that GMOs are safe. The day before the report’s release, Food & Water Watch issued a 10-page report documenting NAS’s structural conflicts of interests—including the millions of dollars it receives from biotech companies like Monsanto and DuPont, whose representatives sit on institutional boards overseeing GMO projects.

Most recently, in July, we uncovered damning evidence that an NAS project director was applying to work for the biotechnology industry group at the same time he was overseeing a GMO report at NAS, which prompted the New York Times story.

This isn’t the first time this narrative has appeared in the Times, and it’s sad that the NAS would repeatedly subject itself to this kind of public embarrassment rather than simply doing the right thing. In failing to address its ethical lapses, the NAS telegraphs a message to the scientific community that conflicts of interest don’t matter, when very clearly they do.

The NAS would be wise to take this opportunity to become a leader on conflicts of interest—and to start to produce the objective, independent science that the world desperately needs on the topic of GMOs. 

 

 

 

 

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version

Monsanto's Roundup is a "probable human carcinogen." We need to ban it!

Get the latest on your food and water with news, research and urgent actions.

Please leave this field empty

Latest News

  • Trump’s Out, Biden’s In! Now The Fight Of Our Lives On Climate Begins.

    Trump’s Out, Biden’s In! Now The Fight Of Our Lives On Climate Begins.

  • Biden’s 100-Day Must-Do List for a Cleaner, Healthier Country

    Biden’s 100-Day Must-Do List for a Cleaner, Healthier Country

  • Fracking, Federal Lands, And Follow-Through: Will President Biden Do What He Promised?

    Fracking, Federal Lands, And Follow-Through: Will President Biden Do What He Promised?

See More News & Opinions

For Media: See our latest press releases and statements

Food & Water Insights

Looking for more insights and our latest research?

Visit our policy & research library
  • Eversource’s Plan to Privatize New Hartford’s Water

  • The Urgent Case for a Moratorium on Mega-Dairies in New Mexico

  • Fracking, Power Plants and Exports: Three Steps for Meaningful Climate Action

Fracking activist with stickersFracking activist in hatLegal team loves family farmsFood & Water Watch organizer protecting your food

Work locally, make a difference.

Get active in your community.

Food & Water Impact

  • Victories
  • Stories
  • Facts
  • Trump, Here's a Better Use for $25 Billion

  • Here's How We're Going to Build the Clean Energy Revolution

  • How a California Activist Learned to Think Locally

Keep drinking water safe and affordable for everyone.

Take Action
food & water watch logo
en Español

Food & Water Watch mobilizes regular people to build political power to move bold & uncompromised solutions to the most pressing food, water, and climate problems of our time. We work to protect people’s health, communities, and democracy from the growing destructive power of the most powerful economic interests.

Food & Water Watch is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization.

Food & Water Action is a 501(c)4 organization.

Food & Water Watch Headquarters

1616 P Street, NW,
Washington, DC 20036

Main: 202.683.2500

Contact your regional office.

Work with us: See all job openings

  • Problems
    • Broken Democracy
    • Climate Change & Environment
    • Corporate Control of Food
    • Corporate Control of Water
    • Factory Farming & Food Safety
    • Fracking
    • GMOs
    • Global Trade
    • Pollution Trading
  • Solutions
    • Advocate Fair Policies
    • Legal Action
    • Organizing for Change
    • Research & Policy Analysis
  • Our Impact
    • Facts
    • Stories
    • Victories
  • Take Action
    • Get Active Where You Live
    • Organizing Tools
    • Find an Event
    • Volunteer with Us
    • Live Healthy
    • Donate
  • Give
    • Give Now
    • Give Monthly
    • Give a Gift Membership
    • Membership Options
    • Fundraise
    • Workplace Giving
    • Planned Giving
    • Other Ways to Give
  • About
  • News
  • Research Library
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Donate
Learn more about Food & Water Action www.foodandwateraction.org.
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • 2021 © Food & Water Watch
  • www.foodandwaterwatch.org
  • Terms of Service
  • Data Usage Policy