Please leave this field empty
Donate Monthly Make a Gift Renew Your Membership Ways to Give
Food & Water Watch Food & Water Watch Food & Water Watch
  • About
  • Problems
  • Campaigns
  • Impacts
  • Research
  • Contact
Donate Monthly Make a Gift Renew Your Membership Ways to Give
  • facebook
  • twitter
Please leave this field empty
Food & Water Watch Food & Water Watch
$
Menu
  • About
  • News
  • Research Library
  • Contact
  • Careers
  • Donate
Search
Please leave this field empty
  • facebook
  • twitter

Meat Inspection

Meat inspection is critical for a safe food supply, and deregulating inspection is a risk we can’t afford to take.  

  • facebook
  • twitter
  • google-plus
  • envelope

We all need safe food and clean water.

Donate
09.10.15

What’s the Problem? 

The size and speed of meatpacking plants has skyrocketed over the last several decades, making it harder to ensure that the meat and poultry produced there are safe and wholesome. Rather than slow down and ensure good sanitation, the industry wants to rely on chemicals to try to disinfect bacteria like Salmonella and sterilize feces that might still be on a carcass.

And now, the meat industry is pushing for privatized meat inspection that relies on company employees to inspect meat and poultry for safety.

For years, we have fought to maintain a strong, well-funded government meat inspection system. Government inspectors are necessary to watch over the industry to make sure that dangerous bugs like E. coli and salmonella don’t contaminate our food. Current proposed rules, which would rely on a regulated inspection system, perfectly exemplify why privatizing such an important safeguard is a terrible idea.

Case Study: The USDA’s Filthy Chicken Rule 

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) wants to implement a new program called the “New Poultry Inspection System,” but a more apt name would be the “Filthy Chicken Rule.” If implemented, this rule would privatize poultry inspections, decreasing the number of USDA inspectors in plants and replacing them with untrained company employees. It would also allow line speeds to go from 140 birds a minute to 175 birds per minute.

This system has been in place in a handful of slaughter facilities since 1998 in a pilot project called the HACCP-based Inspection Model Project (HIMP). The majority of these pilot plants are young chicken slaughter plants, with a few turkey and market hog slaughter plants included in the pilot.

We requested testing results from the USDA under the Freedom of Information Act in August 2011. You can examine our analysis, which notably revealed:

  • Company employees miss many defects in poultry carcasses. The inspection category that had the highest error rate was "Other Consumer Protection 4" for dressing defects such as feathers, lungs, oil glands, trachea and bile still on the carcass. The average error rate for this category in the chicken slaughter facilities was 64 percent and 87 percent in turkey slaughter facilities.  In one turkey slaughter facility, nearly 100 percent of samples found this category of defect.
  • The data showed wide variation in the number of defects missed from plant-to-plant.  There seems to be no consistency across the industry.
  • The overwhelming number of non-compliance records filed for the 14 plants was for fecal contamination found on the carcasses. Out of 229 NRs filed from March to August 2011, 208 (90 percent) were for visible fecal contamination that was missed by company employees.

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has questioned the results from the pilot study. Their report, requested by Senator Kirsten Gillilbrand (D-NY), evaluated 20 young chicken and five young turkey plants and reveals gaping methodological flaws in the pilot project. The GAO rightly questioned how the USDA could use its flawed evaluation of the pilot project as the basis to propose expanding the privatized inspection model across the entire poultry industry.

Food & Water Watch is challenging this privatized inspection program in court.

Related Links

  • Story: My 30 Years as a Poultry Inspector

Related Downloads

  • HIMP Plant Performance Standard Results

    HIMP Plant Performance Standard Results
  • PBIS Response Records

    PBIS Response Records
  • Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version
    02.7.15

    If you ask your server about how their restaurant's chicken was raised and processed, you probably wouldn't get very clear answers. Inspired by the Portlandia "Is it Local" skit, these are the answers you'd get if they knew the real story behind most of the chicken served in the U.S.

    Monsanto's Roundup is a "probable human carcinogen." We need to ban it!

    Get the latest on your food and water with news, research and urgent actions.

    Please leave this field empty

    Latest News

    • Trump’s Out, Biden’s In! Now The Fight Of Our Lives On Climate Begins.

      Trump’s Out, Biden’s In! Now The Fight Of Our Lives On Climate Begins.

    • Biden’s 100-Day Must-Do List for a Cleaner, Healthier Country

      Biden’s 100-Day Must-Do List for a Cleaner, Healthier Country

    • Fracking, Federal Lands, And Follow-Through: Will President Biden Do What He Promised?

      Fracking, Federal Lands, And Follow-Through: Will President Biden Do What He Promised?

    See More News & Opinions

    For Media: See our latest press releases and statements

    Food & Water Insights

    Looking for more insights and our latest research?

    Visit our policy & research library
    • Renewable Natural Gas: Same Ol' Climate-Polluting Methane, Cleaner-Sounding Name

    • The Case to Ban Fracking on Federal Lands

    • Dangerously Deep: Fracking’s Threat to Human Health

    Fracking activist with stickersFracking activist in hatLegal team loves family farmsFood & Water Watch organizer protecting your food

    Work locally, make a difference.

    Get active in your community.

    Food & Water Impact

    • Victories
    • Stories
    • Facts
    • Trump, Here's a Better Use for $25 Billion

    • Here's How We're Going to Build the Clean Energy Revolution

    • How a California Activist Learned to Think Locally

    Keep drinking water safe and affordable for everyone.

    Take Action
    food & water watch logo
    en Español

    Food & Water Watch mobilizes regular people to build political power to move bold & uncompromised solutions to the most pressing food, water, and climate problems of our time. We work to protect people’s health, communities, and democracy from the growing destructive power of the most powerful economic interests.

    Food & Water Watch is a 501(c)3 non-profit organization.

    Food & Water Action is a 501(c)4 organization.

    Food & Water Watch Headquarters

    1616 P Street, NW,
    Washington, DC 20036

    Main: 202.683.2500

    Contact your regional office.

    Work with us: See all job openings

    • Problems
      • Broken Democracy
      • Climate Change & Environment
      • Corporate Control of Food
      • Corporate Control of Water
      • Factory Farming & Food Safety
      • Fracking
      • GMOs
      • Global Trade
      • Pollution Trading
    • Solutions
      • Advocate Fair Policies
      • Legal Action
      • Organizing for Change
      • Research & Policy Analysis
    • Our Impact
      • Facts
      • Stories
      • Victories
    • Take Action
      • Get Active Where You Live
      • Organizing Tools
      • Find an Event
      • Volunteer with Us
      • Live Healthy
      • Donate
    • Give
      • Give Now
      • Give Monthly
      • Give a Gift Membership
      • Membership Options
      • Fundraise
      • Workplace Giving
      • Planned Giving
      • Other Ways to Give
    • About
    • News
    • Research Library
    • Contact
    • Careers
    • Donate
    Learn more about Food & Water Action www.foodandwateraction.org.
    • facebook
    • twitter
    • 2021 © Food & Water Watch
    • www.foodandwaterwatch.org
    • Terms of Service
    • Data Usage Policy