There’s a perverse new way to profit off of future climate misery.
When you think of renewable energy, the images that come to mind are solar panels and wind turbines. Factory farms, the “natural” gas industry and big utility companies want you to add one more: Cow poop.
Power companies and their friends in the fossil fuel industry have a long history of greenwashing their assault on public health, the environment, and our climate. Past PR campaigns from the fossil fuel industry have included children’s coloring books to spin fracking and paid radio spots on NPR that promote ‘clean burning’ natural gas. Now, these industries are partnering with factory farms to convince the public that animal waste can be turned into clean power.
That’s right—the industry is claiming that waste from factory farms should count as a ‘negative’ greenhouse gas emission. Factory farms emit methane directly into the atmosphere, in part thanks to the lagoons and slurries used to manage the huge volumes of manure. Methane is a highly potent greenhouse gas, generated by anaerobic (oxygen-deprived) digestion in these waste pits. So, by building expensive facilities to capture and burn the “biogas,” the logic goes, factory farms reduce their greenhouse gas emissions.
But this ‘solution’ isn’t what it is cracked up to be. For starters, there is no reason to accept massive factory farms as part of a clean energy system. Pasture-based manure management would avoid the need for massive (and often deadly) manure pits, and thus would avoid this methane problem in the first place. Local communities should not allow factory farming, and the huge plumes of methane it generates, regardless of the ability to capture a fraction of that methane.
Second, this technological fix for turning pollution into power often doesn’t work as advertised. Digesters experience a high failure rate; as of spring 2016, the EPA indicated that 13 of 26 digesters in California had been shuttered. And they create other health problems: A California study showed that building out infrastructure in the state to burn biogas and other biomass, such as wood pellets, could create new air quality problems. Large areas of the Central Valley of California, which has some of the worst air quality in the state, would see increased air-particle pollution.
And factory farms are still left with the huge volume of solid waste that remains following the digestion process. Digesters generate methane gas from partially breaking down the manure, but they do not make the nutrient loads (nitrogen and phosphorous) in the manure evaporate or disappear. In fact, recent research finds that spreading manure after anaerobic digestion increases ammonia emissions, compared to spreading raw manure. Ammonia is a toxic gas in its own right that can mix with other chemicals and create new pollutants that can create serious health problems.
So despite all the greenwashing, these systems simply fail to live up to the hype. And we are all paying to keep them going. Because of the high infrastructure costs necessary to capture, transport, process, and burn animal waste gas for fuel, these projects cannot move forward without massive ratepayer or taxpayer subsidies. Every dollar the public spends incentivizing dirty energy from factory farming is money that is not spent on truly clean renewable energy, or on taking steps to actually stop unsustainable farming practices.
The waste from factory farms is not just being proposed for generating electricity, but also as a transportation fuel that is being branded as “renewable natural gas” (RNG). Los Angeles just entered into a multiyear contract to switch some of their gas buses to these RNG vehicles. The spin is that this is cleaner than diesel, which is true if your only alternative is existing diesel vehicles. However, RNG buses release greenhouse gases and harmful air pollutants, whereas electric buses, powered by truly clean energy like solar and wind, create zero emissions. Los Angeles recently made a commitment to move towards 100% clean buses, but the city’s plan leaves the door open to consider even more of these dirty RNG buses in their “renewable” fleet.
Corporate interests are trying to force the public to choose between bad options: Either pay for costly biogas digesters, or you have to live with the massive amounts of methane from factory farms. Either depend on diesel-spewing mass transit, or ‘renewable’ gas buses powered by factory farming. We know there are better choices than that.
Communities must demand that decision-makers look at the full picture of our energy future. Buildling out dependence on biogas incentivizes factory farms and serves the interests of Big Ag.
Groups claim Trump Administration is violating federal law in allowing factory fish farms in the Gulf of Mexico
As climate change warms ocean waters, we’re seeing bigger and stronger hurricanes—which could result in the release of dangerous pollution from factory farms.
Right now a corporation is profiting off of the water in Peoria, Illinois... but not for long if Peoria residents have anything to do with it!
New analysis & infographic shows how closely tied oil and gas CEO pay is with company emissions
UPDATE: This piece originally noted that these nine CEOs “were paid more than $150 million last year to emit 1.7 billion metric tons of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere – about $88,000 per ton.” It should have read “$88,000 per million metric tons.” We have fixed the error at the link and the updated release is below.
We’ve known for decades that it pays to pollute. Sometimes it’s energy, chemical or manufacturing corporations avoiding the costs of environmental protection by illegally – or even legally – pumping hazardous discharge into surrounding air and water. Sometimes it’s fracking companies refusing to provide potable water for communities whose wells and aquifers have been permanently poisoned by the blasting of toxic chemicals underground.
And sometimes, as we examine here, it appears simply to be greater compensation for CEOs whose companies emit more greenhouse gases.
We recently examined the financial disclosure forms of the nine publically-traded American oil and gas companies, along with reports tallying the greenhouse gas emissions footprint at each of these companies, and we found this: Almost without exception, the more carbon emissions the company produced in 2015, the more the CEO got paid in 2016.
High atop both the executive pay and carbon emissions list is Secretary of State Rex W. Tillerson. Before being called up by the Trump administration, Tillerson ran ExxonMobil. In 2016, the final full year of his tenure there, Tillerson was compensated to the tune of almost $27.4 million, or just over $75,000 a day. And in the previous year ExxonMobil emitted almost 600 million metric tons of carbon dioxide-equivalent greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere.
In summation, these nine CEOs were paid more than $150 million last year to emit 1.7 billion metric tons of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere – about $88,000 per million metric tons.
Indeed, it pays to pollute.
If you bought Poland Spring bottled water believing that it was from an actual spring, accusations from two new lawsuits suggest you may have been ripped off.
House Republicans have a plan to slash the EPA budget. It’s up to Senate Democrats to protect the agency’s public health mission.
Water testing in Flint reveals lower lead levels for the first time, but water crisis is ongoing