Food & Water Watch Announces New Program Scrutinizing Market-Based Schemes Affecting Common Resources | Food & Water Watch
Victory! Cleveland passes resolution against antibiotic misuse on factory farms. more wins »
X

Stay Informed

Sign up for email to learn how you can protect food and water in your community.

   Please leave this field empty

Much movement in the right direction is thanks to groups like Food and Water Watch and American Farmland Trust. (in No Turkeys Here)
Mark Bittman
April 11th, 2012

Food & Water Watch Announces New Program Scrutinizing Market-Based Schemes Affecting Common Resources

Washington, D.C.—Today, national consumer organization Food & Water Watch announced a new program to scrutinize the largely unchallenged claims that market-based schemes like pollution trading, water markets, privatization and commodification of common resources will help reduce pollution and manage our water resources.

“Unfortunately, the most powerful financial interests have determined that trading money, risk and related financial products outperforms the profitability of manufacturing products or even trading goods and services,” said Wenonah Hauter, Executive Director of Food & Water Watch. “And in this age of increased competition for natural resources, these interests have their eye on placing natural resources, like clean water and clean air, at the mercy of the market.”

To address the global financial crisis, powerful financial interests and their allies are touting the “green economy,” a vague and ill-defined program promoted by the United Nations as the solution to the global climate crisis. They define nature in terms of capital, prices, profits and markets. Much lauded by the banking industry, this “financialization of nature” reduces the value of water and other life-giving resources to exchangeable financial instruments. It opens the door to the future prophesied by Citigroup chief economist Willem Buiter, who predicts that water will become the most important physical commodity-based asset class in 25 to 30 years. He predicts that spot markets for water will be integrated and that other derivative water-based financial instruments will be exchange-traded and traded over the counter.

But these market-based schemes are largely voluntary and entirely unregulated, representing a drastic departure from the regulation of pollution that helped clean our air and water in the latter half of the 20th century. Food & Water Watch and its allies will be present at Rio+20, the United Nations forum that marks the 20th anniversary of the first UN Conference on Sustainable Development, to protect the UN-recognized human right to water and to reveal how cap-and-trade schemes represent a commodification of nature, not an earnest attempt to address greenhouse gas emissions.

“It’s dangerous to cede regulation of polluters to these schemes that essentially turn one company or farm’s pollution — or lack thereof — into an opportunity for others to keep polluting,” said Hauter. “What’s even more upsetting is that a few non-profit organizations with corporate ties are paving the way to lock natural resources management into the future structure of capital markets. It is not too late to turn back the clock and to move away from these unverifiable schemes and to advocate for a regulatory system that prevents pollution.”  

According to a Food & Water Watch report released today, Bad Credit: How Pollution Trading Fails the Environment, cap-and-trade relies on unverifiable offsets and a permit allocation scheme that benefits current polluters at the expense of everyone else. Furthermore, the price volatility of pollution credits fails to incentivize companies to actually change their operations to limit pollution. Meanwhile, the same investment houses that made a profit from the deregulation of the housing and finance sectors and the energy sector have supported cap-and-trade legislation.

Even though many environmentalists cite industry opposition as a key factor in the defeat of U.S. cap-and-trade legislation to control greenhouse gas emissions at the federal level, industry players have long lobbied on behalf of such market-based approaches to pollution regulation. According to the report, cap-and-trade is based on an obscure economic theory that gained prominence when it was embraced by the Reagan administration as a replacement for regulating air emissions.

“There is an ideological battle being fought that is affecting our common resources. If we let market fundamentalists and industry-funded non-profits tout market-based mechanisms as innovative solutions to our resource problems, we’re ignoring proven methods of reducing pollution and simply speculating on nature,” said Mitch Jones, Director of the Common Resources Program at Food & Water Watch. “These schemes are a smokescreen, giving the appearance of regulation and action while at the same time giving industries carte blanche to continue using and abusing our precious resources — and letting the banking industry profit from it.”

In its effort to scrutinize cap-and-trade and the “green economy,” the Common Resources program will largely focus on the following issues:

  • Pollution Trading Schemes in the Chesapeake Bay and Beyond: Water quality trading, a type of cap-and-trade scheme that does not effectively address the issue of agricultural run-off or industrial pollution, is being promoted by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in places like the Ohio River Basin and the Chesapeake Bay.
  • Water Markets: Water markets are another step in the privatization of public resources. But water is essential for all life, and pricing water like a widget is inappropriate and inhumane, subjecting the essential human need for water to the indifference of the marketplace. At the most extreme, companies cornering the water market will price out the poor.
  • Public-Public Partnerships: Privatization has failed to increase investment in our water services or improve efficiency. Instead, it often has led to deteriorating infrastructure, service disruptions and higher prices for poorer service. A different model, called public-public partnerships (PUPs), can be a more effective method for providing services. PUPs bring together public officials, workers and communities to provide better service for all users more efficiently.
  • Catch Shares and Offshore Aquaculture: Food & Water Watch’s fisheries work, which includes catch shares — a cap-and-trade scheme for fisheries management — and factory fish farming, will be under the Common Resources program. Privatizing our fisheries is devastating fishermen and their communities.

For more information, read the following Food & Water Watch reports:

Bad Credit: How Pollution Trading Fails the Environment

Fish Inc.: The Privatization of U.S. Fisheries Through Catch Share Programs

Public-Public Partnerships: An Alternative Model to Leverage the Capacity of Municipal Water Utilities

Priceless: The Market Myth of Water Pricing

Water = Life: How Privatization Undermines the Human Right to Water

Casino of Hunger: How Wall Street Speculators Fueled the Global Food Crisis 

 

Contact: Darcey Rakestraw, 202-683-2467; drakestraw(at)fwwatch(dot)org

Food & Water Watch works to ensure the food, water and fish we consume is safe, accessible and sustainable. So we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of where their food comes from, keep clean, affordable, public tap water flowing freely to our homes, protect the environmental quality of oceans, force government to do its job protecting citizens, and educate about the importance of keeping shared resources under public control.
###