WIN: After years of grassroots organizing, Gov. O’Malley signs bill making Maryland the first state to ban arsenic in poultry production. more »
X

Stay Informed

Sign up for email to learn how you can protect food and water in your community.

Spread the word

Go

Help us build our community!
Invite your friends to join FWW's list

Connect with us

Twitter Facebook RSS Flickr YouTube
Food & Water Watch does an excellent job of keeping tabs on the food safety issues I care about. It would be a full-time job to stay updated myself. Their petitions are simple, to the point, and easy to share.
Marianne Scrivner
Share |

The case against prepaid water meters

Five residents of Phiri (a section of the famed Soweto township in Johannesburg) have asked the Johannesburg High Court to declare the use of prepaid water meters unconstitutional. South African‚ Constitution guarantees the right to water. The use of prepaid water meters in poor communities violates this right by denying water to those who are not able to pay up front.

Read more about the use of prepaid water meters here.

In Phiri, residents often have no means to access water for weeks at a time. In South Africa, each household is supposed to receive a basic provision of 6,000 liters per household per month. But in many cases, the poorest households do not get even this basic provision. And 6,000 liters per household per month is far from enough for large households, mainly those who are poor. Peter Gleick, a U.S. based water expert, argued for the Phiri residents that this basic provision is insufficient.

The use of prepaid water meters is a severe setback for the country that seeks the progressive realization of socio-economic rights. A previous court case led to a ruling by a higher court that local government must prioritize fulfilling these rights for those in most need. Stay tuned.

For more information contact us – water(at)fwwatch.org

Read the South African media statement on the case.