Quantcast
Hungry Halibut | Food & Water Watch
Victory! Cleveland passes resolution against antibiotic misuse on factory farms. more wins »
X

Stay Informed

Sign up for email to learn how you can protect food and water in your community.

   Please leave this field empty

I volunteer for Food & Water Watch because I get to have a real impact on important campaigns. I know that every time I come out to help out at a table, a public event or activist meeting that what I'm doing is really making a difference.
Anne Bertucio
November 12th, 2008

Hungry Halibut

Download the PDF File

In March 2007, the Bush administration, hoping to reduce the U.S. trade deficit in seafood, urged Congress to reintroduce legislation that would permit raising fish in cages in the open ocean.1However, if the United States moves forward with such intensive fish farming, we could soon have a much more serious seafood deficit.

Disappearing Anchovies and Other Small Fish

Industrial fishing fleets take fish from the ocean faster than the fish reproduce.

More than 75 percent of the ocean fisheries have already been fished to capacity or over-fished, and climate change and pollution further stress wild fish.2 A 2006 article in Science predicts that commercial fish stocks will collapse by 2048 if current fishing trends continue.3 Open ocean fish farming would add to the problem because it relies on small wild fish to feed the fish grown in cages.

The fishmeal industry grinds anchovies, whiting, herring, pilchard, menhaden and other small wild fish, caught in mass quantities off the Pacific coast of North and South America and the Northeast Atlantic, into meal. Removing these fish from the ocean to fatten farmed fish denies food to penguins, whales, and other ocean mammals, and to larger predatory fish. Some of those, including wild cod, bass and grouper, are themselves over-fished or facing extinction.4

One-third of the global fish catch ends up as fishmeal or fish oil. Fish farms use about half of the fishmeal and more than 80 percent of the fish oil.5 In 2003 alone, fish farms consumed about 18 million tons of fish (equivalent to more than 160 billion herring) in the form of fishmeal and oil.6 For example, from 1988-2003, over-fishing eliminated 99 percent of the South American pilchard, commonly turned into fishmeal.7

 

Fish to Pellets to Fish Again

After turning the small wild fish into meal, fish feed processors mix in vitamins, minerals, cellulose, lipids, and other ingredients, and mold the mixture into pellets. Later, the aquaculture operators feed the pellets to the farmed finfish.

How many pounds of wild fish does it take to get one pound of farmed fish? About five pounds of small fish produce one pound of dry fishmeal or fish oil, which in turn makes up about 40 percent of the feed for marine finfish.8 The fish, on average, gain one pound for every two pounds of pellets that they eat, until they reach market size and become food for humans.9 Thus, every two to six pounds of fish caught in the wild yield one pound of fish raised in a cage.

The Wild Fish to Farmed Fish Conversion10

(Under laboratory conditions, with fishmeal as the source of protein in feed)

Fish Pounds of wild fish used to produce one pound of farmed fish
Cobia 11 3.27-6.72
Red porgy 12 4.64
Red drum 13 3.71-5.56
Atlantic halibut 14 2.74-3.17
Atlantic cod 15 2.81-3.07

 

Vegetarian Carnivores?

Recognizing the irreconcilable tension between declining fish stocks and aquaculture‚ projected demand for fishmeal, scientists have tried to replace the fishmeal in feed with proteins such as soybeans, canola, wheat gluten, and peas. Scientists have had some success with omnivorous freshwater fish such as catfish and tilapia, but not with the carnivorous fish the aquaculture industry would raise in offshore cages.

These farmed fish need high quality fish protein in their diet. In various experiments, fish had difficulty digesting vegetable ingredients and often ate less of the feed.16 In one study, all of the cobia fed diets without fishmeal died within five weeks.17 Almost every fish had reduced growth when an alternative protein replaced more than 40 percent of the fish-meal.18 Soy protein concentrate, wheat gluten, and other relatively successful substitutes for fishmeal are also quite expensive, which limits their potential for use in commercial fish farming.19 However, even these ingredients have not pushed the ratio of wild fish to farmed fish below 2:1, which is still a significant net loss.

Fish oil has proved even more difficult to replace in the diets of carnivorous fish than fishmeal. In diets where some fish-meal is replaced, the fish oil content is actually increased to help meet dietary requirements. This is troubling because it takes about 16.7 pounds of wild fish to produce one pound of fish oil.20 Fish that are fed vegetable oil, such as soybean oil, canola oil, and olive oil, have less of the healthy omega-3 fat and more of the unhealthy omega-6 fat than fish fed diets with fish oil.21

Experiments in Replacing Fishmeal with Alternative Proteins22

(Maximum replacement without reduced growth, under laboratory conditions)

Fish Protein < Source Pounds of wild fish used to produce one pound of farmed fish
Halibut23 20% wheat gluten 2.10
Halibut24 45% soy protein concentrate, w/ methionine supplement 2.39
Cod25 25% soybean meal 2.77
Cod26 15% crab by-product meal 2.79
Cobia27 10% soybean meal 3.04
Cobia28 40% soybean isolate 3.66
Cobia29 40% soybean meal 3.75
Cobia30 40% hemp seed meal 3.80
Cobia31 40% yeast protein 3.93
Red drum32 40% soybean meal 4.59

 

 

Conclusion

At a time when the ocean‚ wild fish are already overstressed and depleted, it is reckless and unacceptable to promote off-shore fish farming. At this point, the practice is not sustainable: two to six pounds of wild fish are required to produce one pound of farmed fish. Members of Congress must stand up for the future of our oceans by opposing H.R. 2010, the 2007 National Offshore Aquaculture Act.

Click here to view the footnotes for this article.