President Obama: Steward of the Environment or Steward of the Oil and Gas Industry? | Food & Water Watch
Victory! Farm Bureau case challenging EPA’s right to share factory farm data dismissed. more wins »


You're reading Smorgasbord from Food & Water Watch.

If you'd like to send us a note about a blog entry or anything else, please use this contact form. To get involved, sign up to volunteer or follow the take action link above.

Blog Categories

Blog archives

Stay Informed

Sign up for email to learn how you can protect food and water in your community.

   Please leave this field empty

February 17th, 2014

President Obama: Steward of the Environment or Steward of the Oil and Gas Industry?

By Katherine Cirullo

We live in an era of heightened environmental consciousness and concern, and our world leaders are just starting to catch on. President Obama said it loud and clear during his 2014 State of the Union Address: “Climate change is a fact…When our children’s children look us in the eye and ask if we did all we could to leave them a safer, more stable world, with new sources of energy, I want us to be able to say yes, we did.” But are words enough?

On this President’s day, we should recognize those who have done well for our country and those who have done well for our planet. But we should also consider how our current president’s environmental legacy would be written. It is certain that President Obama’s legacy will be defined not only by what he did for the people, but by what he did for the environment – the air, water and land that we all depend upon. Yet, a president’s legacy is characterized by momentous feats and also failures. The question is: which side of the spectrum will he be on? 

Will President Obama be remembered as an environmental steward or supporter of fossil fuels? Will he stick true to his word and take “bold action now” to combat climate change and drive us toward a sustainable future? Or, will his administration’s commitment to oil and natural gas, relationship with the industry representatives and reluctance to meet with the very people who have been affected by oil and gas development leave a legacy defined by contaminated water, polluted air, unsafe communities and a climate catastrophe? While he would like us to believe in a climate change feat, his dedication to oil and gas development makes us fear impending failure.

Some of our greatest presidential leaders not only spoke of environmental stewardship, they implemented policies and instilled in our society values that our present and future leaders should strive to improve upon.

Theodore Roosevelt (1901–1909), considered the father of conservation, spearheaded the conservationist movement and popularized ideas of good resource management and respect for nature. Roosevelt created the U.S. Forest Service and established five national parks.

Franklin D. Roosevelt (1933-1935) responded to the Dust Bowl, a major environmental catastrophe of the era, by creating programs to prevent further environmental degradation such as soil erosion. As part of the New Deal he established the Civil Conservation Corps (CCC) where Americans planted millions of trees, improved parks and trails and built wind breaks on farms to protect the long-term productivity of soil.

Richard Nixon (1969-1974), despite certain criticisms, bowed to public pressure and established the Environmental Protection Agency in 1970, signing into law landmark environmental safeguards such as the Clean Air Act, the Ocean Dumping Act, the Safe Drinking Water Act and more.

Despite the works of these leaders, President Obama has certainly been handed a mess to clean up. The Bush Administration (champion of the oil and gas industry) amended the Energy Policy Act in 2005 to grant hydraulic fracturing exceptions from the rules of the Safe Drinking Water Act, a move that stimulated America’s recent fracking boom. But, by no means has President Obama taken the action needed to halt this kind of irresponsible fossil fuel development. According to the Environmental Protection Agency, 35,000 wells are fracked each year. Water is being contaminated, pipelines and processing facilities are exploding, and potent methane is leaking into the atmosphere.

Fracking for oil and natural gas is not the road to a clean, sustainable future – it paves the way for greater reliance on a form of energy that is dangerous, not renewable, exacerbates climate change and will not make the United States energy independent. If President Obama wishes to be remembered as a clean energy champion, he should not be leasing pristine federal land, heritage sites and reclamation areas to oil and gas companies. He should not watch the oil and gas industry use or contaminate precious water supplies (especially in regions with severe drought). If President Obama wants to be remembered as a leader who truly combatted climate change, he will take real action to ban fracking now and instead invest in renewables.

You can help make a change. Take action by urging the Obama administration to meet with the victims of fracking-related water contamination and re-open the water contamination investigations that the Environmental Protection Agency abandoned.

5 Comments on President Obama: Steward of the Environment or Steward of the Oil and Gas Industry?

  1. karen slobod says:

    Van Jones, Obama’s ex cabinet member is EMPHATICALLY OPPOSED:

    Van Jones says “”Every time we have a show, somebody says something … about Keystone, and somehow Keystone is going to create all these jobs,” Jones said in the Feb. 3 episode of Crossfire. “Then it turns out, look at the actual numbers. It turns out the actual numbers are 3,900 temporary jobs in the construction sector and 35 permanent jobs. … and the oil is going through the U.S., NOT to the U.S.”

    He also says right now we need to turn a corner away from coal and oil or we’re cooked.

  2. Leilani Clark says:

    I think our President has been leaning towards the oil and gas industry. Why? They don’t support him. I was hopeful of a different scenario because he was young and had children. So far fracking has destroyed land and water and lives, and I don’t see him rejecting KXL. I don’t quite understand how the Republicans agree that giving a foreign Country (even an ally) the rights to American’s land.

    With tears in my eyes…..

    • Red Nectaryne says:

      Absolutely, L. This same father and husband signed off on our food supply as well when Monsanto was essentially granted a pass to never be prosecuted for any damages arising from the use of its pesticide infested seed stock. Yet, his wife is trying to get America’s students healthier foods on their school days? Its pushme-pullyou. What a mess and we are the victims.

  3. Kathy Kroll says:

    Fossil fuels are dinosaurs. Let’s leave the horses and bayonets in the past and and take charge of the future by protecting our one and ONLY HOME, earth, by upgrading our thinking of energy sources.

  4. Nancy Donnan Coleman says:

    I am a retired RN and have studied the harmful effects of fracking. It is amazing to me that anyone who has studied the issues associated with fracking would even consider doing this or recommend anyone to frack. We have one earth and we need to wake up and take care of it, before it is too late. We installed some solar and are very happy to have done this for an economic and ethical reasons.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *