Congratulations to California activists! Following public outcry, California affirms water as a human right more wins »
X

Welcome!

You’re reading Smorgasbord from Food & Water Watch.

If you’d like to send us a note about a blog entry or anything else, please use this contact form. To get involved, sign up to volunteer or follow the take action link above.

Blog Categories

Blog archives

Stay Informed

Sign up for email to learn how you can protect food and water in your community.

   Please leave this field empty

Share |
March 31st, 2009

Kindai tuna , a poorly designed attempt at sustainability

A small group of U.S. restaurants are hoping to lure consumers back to eating bluefin tuna now that stock depletion has made it a socially unacceptable choice. The path to putting bluefin back on a menu? A new product, called Kindai. This particular brand of tuna was created by a lab at a Japanese university, from hatched eggs farmed in captivity.

Bluefin tunaIt almost sounds like a good idea, with wild stocks being so precariously low , until you consider the facts. Kindai tuna still has many of the disadvantages of other farmed fish. Tuna are carnivorous , they eat other smaller fish. The need for using fish in the feed for farmed tuna could contribute to depletion of various small wild food fish stocks, as it can take between 10 to 13 pounds of wild fish to produce just one pound of bluefin tuna. Though Kindai are being raised from egg to adult, rather than catching juveniles from the wild and growing them for market as has been done in the past, the scientists still must catch a few dozen wild bluefin each year to ensure the population has enough genetic variability.

The Kindai are kept in open ocean pens for growout. Problems associated with open ocean aquaculture are well known: release of waste and feces into the ocean; high incidence of diseases and parasites that can be spread to wild fish; and high potential for escaped fish to interbreed with and outcompete native fish. In addition, various chemicals that may be used to keep both fish and pens clean can cause human health and environmental concerns.

Bluefin TunaAlso worth noting is that the product could undermine years of public outreach about bluefin tuna. There has been much education done, both by environmentalists and by restaurateurs who have taken bluefin off the menu, for the sake of reversing the damage to bluefin stocks and increasing awareness about the issue. Re-introducing bluefin and making it seem sustainable and socially acceptable will therefore be very confusing for consumers.

European Flags at the European ParliamentThe state of bluefin tuna stocks is so serious that last week the European Parliament approved a bluefin recovery plan to lower catch levels and permit member states to suspend fishing authorizations of vessels that have exhausted their quota. Those wanting to bring bluefin tuna back to restaurant menus at this time are out of tune with real world happenings. Encouraging a continued market for these fish at this time is irresponsible.

We urge consumers to avoid Kindai and other forms of bluefin tuna for now until ecological concerns due to overfishing and farm production are resolved.

To learn more about where to look for cleaner, greener, safer seafood options, be sure to check out our Smart Seafood Guide.

- Sofía Baliño

2 Comments on Kindai tuna , a poorly designed attempt at sustainability

  1. Mike says:

    Management systems are in place throughtout the four main bluefin fisheries and the quotas are not respected at all. Japan takes the majority of bluefin tuna out of the water and consumes the majority. Is it not a good thing to at least explore other ways to meet the demand when the traditional methods are as destructive as they are?

    Wild caught practices (ie longlining) threaten both non targeted species and juvenile tunas which are usually dead by the time they are pulled from the water. 22% of what is caught by the worldwide pelagic longline industry is bycatch, and the majority of it will be dumped dead and wasted.

    Its true there are many problems with aquaculture which are valid, such as the feed conversion ratio of carnivorous finfish. But considering feed is the main expense going into most aquaculture operations, it is area of study given quite a bit of attention by anyone involved in the industry. The farmed salmon industry has decreased both the amount of marine fish meal and oil used in feed dramatically in recent years and are looking to other sources of land based and marine raised sources of protein.

    While I agree with you that in order to really save the Tuna it should not be consumed by anyone, but I would be kidding myself if I thought this advice would be heeded by the Japanese or stop a fisherman in a developing country to pass up the opportunity to make upwards of 500% of his annual income by landing one bluefin. Other measures of management and enforcement need to put in place and other avenues of production need to be developed, examined and constantly reworked in order to save this species. Otherwise we can sit back and refuse to eat it while it continues to disappear from our oceans.

  2. Michael says:

    Extremism is never a great attitude to approach an issue with. Whilst I agree with the underlying concerns re the wild fishery, I do think the Kindai is a step in the right direction.

    Is it perfection – no. It is not!

    But its a start and there has never anything in the history of man been perfected out the gate…..it is a series of steps along the way.

    Please give them a chance, encourage the right direction.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*