For the Sake of Women’s (and Men’s) Health, Gloria Steinem Enters the Fracking Fray in New York | Food & Water Watch
Victory! Farm Bureau case challenging EPA’s right to share factory farm data dismissed. more wins »


You're reading Smorgasbord from Food & Water Watch.

If you'd like to send us a note about a blog entry or anything else, please use this contact form. To get involved, sign up to volunteer or follow the take action link above.

Blog Categories

Blog archives

Stay Informed

Sign up for email to learn how you can protect food and water in your community.

   Please leave this field empty

March 6th, 2013

For the Sake of Women’s (and Men’s) Health, Gloria Steinem Enters the Fracking Fray in New York

By Seth Gladstone

Ban Fracking!Perhaps more than anyone in recent history, Gloria Steinem has become synonymous with the protection of women’s health and safety. From her early years at New York Magazine and Ms. Magazine – defending the right to choose and promoting the Equal Rights Amendment – to her subsequent work with race and labor activists like Coretta Scott King and Cesar Chavez, Steinem has set the benchmark for safety, fairness and equality among not just women, but all residents of the nation.

In more recent years, Steinem has turned her attention to public health threats that are derived from the weakening of environmental protections like the Clean Water Act. So it should come as no surprise that she recently signed a letter to New York Governor Andrew Cuomo urging him to halt any consideration of fracking in his state before a collection of long-term statewide and national public health studies on the controversial natural gas drilling method are completed. The letter was also signed by hundreds of doctors, health organizations and environmental and consumer groups from across the nation.

The immense grassroots campaign against fracking in New York has mobilized national activists like Gloria Steinem for a number of reasons. For one, it represents the first, best chance Americans have had to ban the dangerous practice in a state where it could be done widely and aggressively. Such a feat would knock the oil and gas industry back on its heels and send a clear message to the rest of the nation – and the world – that with enough organizing and enough commitment, corporate fossil fuel polluters can be reigned in and shut down.

Also on the radar of national activists is Gov. Cuomo’s worst-kept-secret-ever presidential ambition. Like his peers in New Jersey, Maryland and Colorado, Cuomo spends much of his time calculating how he might improve his chances of moving into the White House, while at the same time managing a robust anti-fracking movement in his own backyard. As evidenced by the buzz his pending fracking decision has already created in places like North Carolina and Iowa, growing national focus is assured.

For Ms. Steinem specifically, the recent letter to Gov. Cuomo may have held particular significance. Highlighting the critical importance of a comprehensive, independent public health study of fracking to the long-term health and wellbeing of New Yorkers, the letter was signed by organizations such as Breast Cancer Action, the Breast Cancer Fund and the Breast Cancer Network of Western New York. A breast cancer survivor herself, Steinem surely understands the gravity of cancer and the impact environmental degradation and pollution can have on cancer rates and public health in general.

Though his current timeline for a decision on fracking in New York is something of a mystery, we can be sure that as he attracts the attention of more and more national advocates for health, safety and social equality like Ms. Steinem, the pressure on Gov. Cuomo to ban fracking in New York will continue to rise. As 2016 creeps ever closer on the horizon, Cuomo would do well to take heed and act now.

3 Comments on For the Sake of Women’s (and Men’s) Health, Gloria Steinem Enters the Fracking Fray in New York

  1. William Sharfman says:

    Governor Cuomo can be a desirable leader, by caring for the health and welfare of his citizens first and foremost; or be an ordinary follower by setting the interests of human health and welfare aside, and doing the politically expedient thing, which would make him just another garden variety politician who represents only himself. The choice is his. Fracking cries out to be BANNED in New York State. We could be a leader here in R & D in innovative new energy sources, a worldwide hub of positive activity and economic gain through development of clean energy.

    • Dawn Hoffman says:

      Well said William,well said! It’s not all about money,it’s about our future generations. We borrow the land from them,we need not to rape it.And our Governer has the power in his hand to stop the madness.

  2. Candace says:

    I’m not that much of a internet reader to be honest but your blogs really
    nice, keep it up! I’ll go ahead and bookmark your site to come back later. All the best

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *