Antibiotic Use in Livestock Feed: Trust But Verify? | Food & Water Watch
Victory! Farm Bureau case challenging EPA’s right to share factory farm data dismissed. more wins »


You're reading Smorgasbord from Food & Water Watch.

If you'd like to send us a note about a blog entry or anything else, please use this contact form. To get involved, sign up to volunteer or follow the take action link above.

Blog Categories

Blog archives

Stay Informed

Sign up for email to learn how you can protect food and water in your community.

   Please leave this field empty

November 21st, 2012

Antibiotic Use in Livestock Feed: Trust But Verify?

By Sarah Borron

Antibiotic-resistant super bugs pose one of the most threatening public health problems.

Take action today to ensure accountability and transparency in the use of antibiotics on farm animals.

The misuse of antibiotics in livestock feed, known as “subtherapeutic use,” is an ongoing problem in U.S. agriculture and a threat to public health. The practice of feeding large groups of livestock antibiotics whether or not they are sick contributes to the development and spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, threatening people with diseases that are harder to treat.

The FDA, the government agency responsible for tackling this problem, has touted its voluntary initiatives to encourage the industry to change its practices. But Food & Water Watch has spoken out against subtherapeutic use of antibiotics and supports a legislative ban on the practice. We don’t think a voluntary ban is enough, and, thanks to internal FDA documents obtained from the Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER), we discover that FDA isn’t so sure the plan will work either.

PEER requested documentation from the FDA on industry’s support for the voluntary guidance on antibiotic use in livestock. Instead, PEER received internal memos revealing that FDA staff acknowledged serious concerns: 

Click here to see our infographic about how antibiotic use on farms makes us sick.

  • A weakness of the voluntary strategy is its reliance on industry cooperation and lack of deadlines in the guidance. Some emails show that FDA staff are not confident the industry will comply.
  • Regulations might be necessary to reduce antibiotic use in livestock feed in a timely fashion.
  • The FDA doesn’t even collect enough data to evaluate the effectiveness of the voluntary strategy.
  • The FDA tweaked language in the voluntary guidance to improve the agency’s chances of winning an appeal on a lawsuit that would force it to regulate subtherapeutic antibiotic use. The lawsuit states clearly that voluntary strategies are unacceptable.

We’re left scratching our heads. The threat of antibiotic-resistant bacteria is real and pressing. The voluntary strategy may or may not work. After decades of delay, why dilly-dally with a voluntary strategy instead of writing and enforcing regulations to do the job effectively?

As we press Congress and the FDA on the larger issue of subtherapeutic antibiotic use, there’s one action you can take today to improve the situation. The FDA is requesting feedback on how to improve its data collection on antibiotics used in livestock feed. No matter what, we need that data to see if the situation is getting better or worse. Take a moment today to ensure accountability and transparency as we work to change this issue.

6 Comments on Antibiotic Use in Livestock Feed: Trust But Verify?

  1. Amanda Withrow says:

    Please stop using antibiotics!!

  2. Linda says:

    I wish you would stop giving these animal antibiotic’s you are making a lot people sick. I can not eat any type meat because you are doing such. I think the way you treat animals is not right. An wish you would stop mistreating them to make almighty dollar!! I have saw them stacked in trucks going to market …. how they look stacked in those trucks is really sad …. an you think it is okay to do that…sorry I do not agree with that an I hope a law is passed in congress to stop the way you are doing business!! Thank you Linda

  3. Rene Knapp says:

    Ich bin der Meinung das man Käfighaltung abschafft !! Dann werden die Tiere nicht Krank und brauch kein Antibotika es gibt dann auch keine Keime die gegen etwas Resistent werden können!!

  4. Mary Anne Andrews says:

    These aren’t vitamins you’re handing out. What goes in livestock passes on to the rest of us. We need to know exactly what we’re eating to protect ourselves and our children. Beyond that, I appreciate how hard it is to do what you do every day and thank you for your labor.

  5. Joanna Gradilone says:

    Why do they keep doing this? Many people now take antibiotics that don’t work because of this. That also goes into the water supplies and doubles the risk.

  6. Sonia Thompson says:

    If it’s going to happen, consumers deserve to know.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *