- About
- Take Action
- Issues
- Food
- Water
- Common Resources
- ALL ISSUES
- Bottled Water
- Catch Shares
- Climate Change/Rio+20
- Consumer Labels
- Desalination
- Factory Farms
- Factory Fish Farming
- Farm Bill: Better Food Starts Here
- Federal Budget
- Fish
- Food
- Food & Water Justice
- Food Safety
- Fracking
- Genetically Engineered Foods
- GE Salmon
- Global
- Groundwater Protection
- Irradiation
- Nanotechnology
- Radiation Impacts
- Renew America’s Water
- Triclosan (Endocrine Disruptor)
- Water
- Water Conservation
- Water Privatization
- World Water
- Campaigns
- Research
- Tools & Resources
- News & Blog
- DONATE
Fact Sheets: Food
Fact Sheets Count: 74April 23, 2013
Ractopamine
Using ractopamine, a drug that makes livestock grow lean meat faster, may pose human health risks and can compromise animal health and welfare.
April 12, 2013
Monsanto’s Seed Company Subsidiaries
The rise of genetic engineering (GE) has not only diminished the ability for farmers to practice their own methods of seed selection, but also turned another sector of agriculture into a business monopolized by a few corporations. Monsanto, the largest supplier of GE seed traits, now controls 60 percent of corn and 62.5 percent of soybean seeds and seed trait licenses in the United States.
April 8, 2013
Monsanto: A Corporate Profile
Roundup herbicide. Agent Orange. PCBs. Genetically engineered seeds. These may not seem related, but they all have something in common: Monsanto.
December 5, 2012
The Economic Cost of Food Monopolies
The agriculture and food sector is unusually concentrated, with just a few companies dominating the market in each link of the food chain. In most sectors of the U.S. economy, the four largest firms control between 40 and 45 percent of the market, and many economists maintain that higher levels of concentration can start to erode competitiveness. Yet according to data compiled by the University of Missouri-Columbia in 2012, in the agriculture and food sector, the four largest companies controlled 82 percent of the beef packing industry, 85 percent of soybean processing, 63 percent of pork packing, and 53 percent of broiler chicken processing.
September 19, 2012
How Much Will Labeling Genetically Engineered Foods Really Cost?
Since the first genetically engineered (GE) crops were introduced in the United States in the 1990s, consumers have not been able to tell whether they are eating these controversial new ingredients. And whenever the subject of mandatory labeling of GE foods comes up, the food industry claims that labeling will be prohibitively expensive.
August 31, 2012
Most Americans Want Labeling of Genetically Engineered Foods
When it comes to labeling genetically engineered (GE) foods, the United States lags behind nearly 50 developed nations, including all European Union member states, Australia, Brazil, China, Japan, New Zealand, Russia, Saudi Arabia and South Korea. The European Union requires all food, animal feeds and processed products with biotech content to bear GE labels.
July 23, 2012
GE Crops, Chemicals and the Environment
Roundup, an herbicide produced by Monsanto that contains the active ingredient glyphosate, has been vigorously applied to crops for years. Most genetically engineered (GE) crops are designed to be tolerant of specially tailored herbicides. Farmers can spray the herbicide on their fi elds, killing the weeds without harming the GE crops. With the development of Roundup Ready crops, the application intensity of Roundup has only increased.
July 19, 2012
Greenwashing GE Crops
The biotechnology industry is aggressively promoting the environmental sustainability of genetically engineered (GE) crops. The industry claims that GE crops can reduce herbicide use, increase yields to feed a hungry planet, and develop new crops that are adapted to climate change.
How GE Crops Hurt Farmers
With the rise of GE crops, coexistence between organic, non-GE and GE production has become more diffi cult due to the potential for gene flow and commingling of crops at both the planting and harvesting levels.
June 27, 2012
Don’t Bet on Wall Street: The Financialization of Nature and the Risk to Our Common Resources
All too often when an economist or banker looks out at an expanse of virgin forest or free-flowing river, she doesn’t see nature — she sees “natural capital.” This concept promotes the view that our natural resources should be attached a value and managed using market-based principles of supply and demand. It is the cornerstone of the “green economy” that many free-market proponents and market-oriented environmentalists assert will provide environmental sustainability.

